Vivid Translucent Cladding

A coloured coating thin enough to let the grain read through, for elevations that should still be recognisably timber but not left to weather on their own terms. Two builds: 5D is semi-transparent and glossy and lasts five to seven years between coats, 3 is fully transparent and matte and wants recoating every two to three. The colour choice and the climate both move that interval.

Manufacturer page
Thermory Vivid Translucent Cladding

Carbon and evidence

Product Evidence

Evidence currently held for the Thermory product record.

Thermory

Recorded Carbon Result

-583kgCO₂e/m³

A1–A3 GWP-total per m³ of board, per the EPD. Negative because 808 kgCO2e of biogenic carbon is held in the timber. That store is not permanent: the same EPD declares C3 = +821 kgCO2e when the boards are processed at end of life, so cradle-to-grave is close to neutral rather than strongly negative.

Indicator: GWP-total

A1–A3 covers raw-material supply, transport to manufacture and manufacturing. It is product-stage information, not a whole-life result.

Environmental Product Declaration

EPD recorded
Coverage
Product family
Declared unit
1 m³ 443 kg
Programme
EPD Hub
Registration
HUB-4843
Standard
EN 15804:2012+A2:2019/AC:2021
Valid until
2031-01-12
Verification
Third-party verified

One average across every coated board Thermory run, not a figure per coating family or per colourway. A black opaque board and a light oiled board share this number here because the EPD does not separate them.

Read the EPDSource: PDF impact table, "GWP – total" row: A1 ‐9,17E+02, A2 4,71E+01, A3 2,87E+02, A1-A3 ‐5,83E+02, A4 6,90E+01, A5 7,51E+00, C1 1,76E‐01, C2 2,39E+00, C3 8,21E+02, C4 0,00E+00, D ‐1,64E+02.

Carbon profile

kgCO2e per 1 m³ of board · each bar starts at zero · local scale

A1-A3 product

-583

A4-A5 site*

76.5

B use

not declared

C end of life

824

D reuse / recycling

-164

Stores more carbon than making it emits — and the stored carbon largely leaves again at end of life.

adds carbon stores or removes EPD scenario* reuse/recycling potential (D)
* EPD transport and installation scenario, not this project's. Not declared: use. Module D shows potential impacts or benefits from reuse, recovery or recycling after the product's assessed life. It is reported separately and never added to A-C. Do not compare bar lengths between materials. Each chart may use a different scale and declared unit.

Reported GWP Modules

Displayed as stored; modules are not added together here.

A1–A3

-583 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

A4*

69 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

A5*

7.51 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

C1

0.176 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

C2

2.39 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

C3

821 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

C4

0 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

D

-164 kgCO₂e

per 1 m³ of board

* A4/A5 are EPD scenarios, not project-specific results. Module D is outside the A–C system boundary and is not added to A–C. Module nomenclature follows BS EN 15978 / EN 15804. Declared values are suitable as inputs to a whole life carbon assessment under the RICS Professional Standard (2nd edition); this panel is not an assessment.

Upfront Carbon (A1–A5)*

-506 kgCO₂e per 1 m³ of board

A1–A3 -583 + A4 69 + A5 7.51 · GWP-total, as declared

* Includes the EPD’s A4/A5 scenario assumptions, not project-specific transport or installation. This is the aggregation the proposed Part Z applies upfront limits to. The A1–A3 figure includes declared biogenic storage of -808 kgCO₂e; Part Z aggregates upfront carbon excluding sequestered carbon, which is the assessor's adjustment to make.

Sourced Product Claims

  • Stores 808 kgCO2e/m³ biogenic carbon, releases 821 at end of lifeThird-party verifiedSource
  • Third-party verified EPD, valid to 2031-01-12Third-party verifiedSource

1 claim is held in the staging record but not presented as product evidence because an exact public source has not yet been mapped.

Comparison Status

This result should be displayed for information only and not ranked against another product.

  • • The carbon result is not linked to an evidence source.
  • • The EPD is not linked to an evidence source.

Evidence Gaps

  • 1 sustainability claim is withheld because exact public evidence is not mapped.

Design & Specification Notes

Qualitative notes for early design discussion. Not product-specific EPD evidence, and not a basis for numerical comparison.

A coloured coating thin enough to let the grain read through, for elevations that should still be recognisably timber but not left to weather on their own terms.

Typical Uses

  • Facade cladding
  • Weather protection
  • External accents

Key Performance

Weather-resistant finish for facade exposure.

Typical Service-Life Estimate

40 years

Generic estimate for early design discussion; confirm with the manufacturer.

Specification Actions

  • Confirm FSC or PEFC certification for all timber products.
  • Request chain-of-custody documentation from supplier.
  • Confirm the current EPD covers the selected product, finish and manufacturing route.

Indicative Health & Indoor Air

low Risk

Thermal modification uses heat and steam only — no preservatives or biocides are added to the timber. The coating is a factory-applied water-based system. Modified timber is more brittle than untreated softwood and the dust is fine; standard cutting-dust precautions apply.

Evidence:Third-party verified

Specification

Range
Vivid Translucent 5D and 3
Collection
Vivid
Finish
Thermally modified board, translucent coloured coating
Country of manufacture
Estonia

Cookies — essential ones keep the site working; optional analytics help us improve it. No advertising cookies.